Are you one of the 3 in 5 dentists who will fall victim to embezzlement?

Would YOU Recognize the Warning Signs and Red Flags of EMBEZZLEMENT in YOUR Office?
Case Study
case study bubbles case study bubbles center case study bubbles right

3 in 5

dentists will be embezzlement victims
of ≈7% of monthly income.

– Dentistry IQ

2/3s

of U.S. dental practices report being victim of
fraud, theft, embezzlement.

– ADA Study

50-60%

probability of dentist being fraud victim
during career.

– Dental Tribune

49%

of dental practices experienced employee theft; 46% of those experienced more than once.

– ADA Council Survey

Would YOU Recognize the Warning Signs and Red Flags of EMBEZZLEMENT in YOUR Office?

The exact statistic may not be clear, but the message certainly is: Dental practices are highly susceptible to theft and embezzlement by employees.

Such statistics are necessarily low because there is an unquantifiable amount of fraud that is never detected, or is detected but not disclosed.

— David Harris, dental-practice fraud expert

The What and Why of Embezzlement

You may associate the term embezzlement with elaborate schemes, millions of dollars and offshore bank accounts. But in actuality, embezzlement covers all means of stealing from an employer. There are many ways to do that besides pocketing actual cash; for example, the employee could be adjusting off copays for friends without the doctor’s knowledge and concurrence. Each incidence of theft may be small, but over time, left undetected and uncorrected, totals can become surprisingly large even in small businesses.

According to dental-practice fraud expert David Harris in an interview with Dental Tribune, smaller businesses are more likely to experience problems than larger ones. Worse, the typical dental office management structure is inherently vulnerable to theft because the doctor is busy doing what he/she does best – i.e., caring for patients – having delegated most of the business management functions to trusted team members. Moreover, detection can be trickier in a dental practice compared with other small businesses because of the proliferation of 3rd party payors (i.e., insurance companies).

According to Dentistry IQ there are two typical reasons for embezzlement:

  1. Personal hardship that leads to desperation, and
  2. Dishonesty; people who believe they should live better than their compensation allows.

There is a third reason, however, that is unique to medical and dental practices:

  1. Employees feel underpaid in comparison to what the doctor earns. They believe that without them, the doctor would not be successful and thus they deserve a piece of the pie.

Sadly, a family member, friend or long-term employee is no less likely to steal from their employer.

A True Story

The following Case Study is a true story about a savvy, tenacious outside billing consultant from eAssist Dental Solutions who uncovered misappropriations by the office manager at a client’s practice. First, we’ll explain how Emma (not her real name) put the complex puzzle pieces together. Then we’ll describe the red flags she identified from her vantage point, and what you as the practice owner could (and should!) be on the lookout for so as not to allow these kinds of “opportunities” in your own practice.

Terminology

Embezzlement: Theft or misappropriation of funds placed in one’s trust or belonging to one’s employer.

Synonyms:

  • Theft Misappropriation
  • Fraud Swindling
  • Stealing Larceny

Reasons / Rationale

  • Personal hardship
  • Dishonesty
  • “I deserve it”

Putting the Puzzle Pieces Together

Claims Closed

The biggest trigger to make Emma start to think something wasn’t right was seeing on reports that claims had been closed, and yet there were no payments posted for the services provided. She found instances where a claim had been processed, and an insurance check issued on a certain date, and yet the claim was closed without that payment having ever been posted. 

When Emma would ask the OM about such a case, the OM would say she didn’t know, and quickly try to change the subject. Only when Emma would pointedly ask, “Did you receive the check?” would the OM offer to look, and then immediately find the check, or the EOB (Explanation of Benefits) and tell Emma the check had been received, and that Emma should go ahead and post it (but without providing proof to Emma).

By closing the claim, the OM knew it wouldn’t show up on an aging report, so Emma would have no reason to follow up on it. Emma admits it was somewhat by chance that she came across these anomalies in the first place, but once she did, she was compelled to dig further. If the OM’s objective was to make Emma look bad, it was at the expense of her patients, which was perplexing to Emma; it just didn’t make sense.

Uncharacteristic Disorganization

Emma knew that, as a rule, the OM was extremely well-organized and on top of details. In fact, she recalled that the OM’s scanned documents were the most organized and precise she had ever seen. When they spoke, the OM always knew exactly what patient Emma was talking about, what insurance they had, benefits allowed, etc.

So when the OM would “suddenly” lose a check… but then just as suddenly find it when pointedly asked about it, Emma thought such uncharacteristic disorganization was odd, and definitely a red flag.

Numbers Not Adding Up

The OM made it extremely difficult for Emma to track what she was doing to hide inaccuracies, and cover the fact that numbers weren’t adding up the way they should. But, ironically, not because the OM seemed to have a definitive methodology. She used a combination of: falsely closing claims, posting insurance payments as patient payments and vice versa, posting payments to wrong accounts, making adjustments that didn’t match, writing off balances, notating that payments were posted to wrong accounts to cover the fact that checks had never been scanned in. 

All combined, it took a tenacious, if not forensic accounting mind to figure out what the OM was doing.

Trusting Instincts

Emma admits it was all of the above combined that gave her a gut feeling that something was wrong. Even though she wasn’t sure what, there were too many small things that didn’t mesh, and behavior that didn’t make sense.

Emma spoke with her eAssist Team Leader, who agreed something sounded suspicious and encouraged her to trust her instincts, continue digging, and take the time to figure it out. She created a detailed spreadsheet to track what she had found, and identify checks that needed explanation. Laying it out this way convinced Emma beyond any doubt that the OM was indeed taking money.

Emma requested copies of checks from banks, but only those she could get for free, and only those she could get directly, as opposed to them being mailed to the office; Emma didn’t want to tip off the OM before she fully understood what was going on, and could speak with the doctor, if necessary.

From one bank Emma was able to get a copy of one of the missing checks, as well as a copy of one of the scanned checks. This enabled Emma to compare if the OM had signed or stamped the checks. The scanned check had been stamped, whereas the non-scanned check had been signed allegedly by the doctor. Having never seen the doctor’s signature, Emma couldn’t be certain, but she suspected it was forged.

Breaking the Bad News

At this point Emma knew it was time to inform the doctor. She heeded her Team Leader’s advice to not only be well-armed with facts, but to tread lightly when talking with a doctor with whom she had never before spoken. That was because the OM had succeeded in blocking Emma from ever establishing a relationship with the doctor.

Emma called the doctor after hours on a Friday, trying to be certain she wasn’t in the office, or with the OM. Emma caught the doctor at home, who was understandably surprised to hear from, in essence, a “stranger.”

Emma told the doctor she had found some checks that had not been scanned in, and that she wanted to make sure they had been received. Emma respectfully asked the doctor if she would please check her bank account.

Again, the doctor was understandably cautious and asked Emma some clarifying questions. Emma handled the conversation brilliantly by saying, “If you don’t have them, then I feel we should discuss this a bit further. And if you do have them, great; we just need to change some protocols on our end and make sure all checks are getting scanned in.”

When the doctor checked her bank account and was unable to find the checks in question, she called Emma back and they talked further. That’s when Emma let her know she had a copy of the front and back of the check and that one had her signature on it. When the doctor exclaimed, “Wait, what?!” Emma replied, “I take it you don’t sign your checks?” And the doctor said, “No, I never do.”

In essence, Emma let the doctor come to her own conclusion, vs. Emma coming right out and saying, “I think your office manager is stealing from you.” The doctor might have been offended, and the OM might have been a good friend or even a relative. Emma gained the doctor’s trust by asking questions and waiting for answers before taking the conversation further, and leading the doctor to her own conclusion.

The Outcome

The doctor and her husband went into the office over the weekend to search for the checks, and also analyzed bank statements. Unable to find the missing checks, the doctor called an attorney friend who advised her to immediately terminate the OM. The doctor had been inclined to try to “catch her in the act,” but the attorney advised that, once the doctor knew, it would become a liability issue because they did not know if the OM had been stealing from patients, plus she had access to all patients’ protected information.

The OM was brought in and terminated first thing Monday morning. She admitted she had been taking insurance checks when they came in, forging the doctor’s signature on the backs, and depositing them into her own bank account through her night drop ATM. She did not admit how much she had taken overall; she had been careful to take amounts small enough so as to stay under the radar, but the total was suspected to be quite significant over the more than three years that she had been employed as the OM.

The doctor and her attorney ultimately addressed liability with the OM’s bank (since the checks were not made out to the OM and therefore should not have been accepted for deposit into her account), used a forensic accounting team to investigate, and subpoenaed the OM’s bank records in order to fully prosecute.

Red Flags

An outside billing consultant like Emma will typically work remotely. They are therefore not in the office working side-by-side with other team members, seeing original documents (including checks), and witnessing how documents are physically handled at the office. From afar, a savvy remote billing consultant will consider the following to be red flags that “something is just not right.”

Red Flags
  • Inability to reconcile accounts
  • Many unexplained adjustments
  • Single employee handling multiple tasks (without oversight)
  • Billing and payment complaints
  • EFTs discouraged
  • Communication with doctor blocked
  • Awkward relationship with office manager (or other staff member in a financial role)
Red Flags

You May Win… But You Still Lose

Even when you discover and successfully prosecute an embezzler, you still lose. Dental IQ assessed the average loss at roughly 7% of monthly income. Using round numbers, the average dentist earns $160,000 a year (double that for a specialist), which equates to nearly $1000 a month, or $12,000 a year in lost revenue. Since embezzlers tend to start small then get bolder as their confidence and success grows, the amount can be substantially more than that when theft goes undetected for years.

Additionally, finding out a trusted employee – perhaps even a friend or family member – has been stealing from you is tantamount to shell-shock. Even when caught early, the time, expense and emotional drain of prosecuting the thief is detrimental to the doctor, the business, and other team members.

Doctors who have been through the ordeal come out gun-shy – unable to trust anyone with their financial functions and banking information for a long time afterwards. They may even end up scanning incoming checks themselves, and making their own bank deposits. And, doing all that while having to interview, hire and orient a new office manager (or front office lead or bookkeeper or accountant or whomever did the dirty deed).

You don’t want to have to go through that!!

Protect Your Practice

Based on decades of experience, fraud expert Harris knows that if someone is determined to steal, they will find a way to do it. He and others advise: (a) Make it as difficult as possible with strong control systems, (b) Don’t be an absentee business owner by delegating critical functions without appropriate oversight, and most importantly, (c) Have systems in place that ensure early detection. 

An essential business practice is to always have adequate checks and balances in place, including another set of eyes watching over your income on a daily basis. High on every industry expert’s list of the most important protocols you should have in place to ideally deter, and then quickly detect theft, are: 

  • Separate money management duties across two or more employees so they can monitor and cross-check each other’s work. As examples: the person handling patient payments should not be the one updating patient records; there should be protocols for scanning checks and verifying receipt into your bank account by you, not the team member responsible for the deposit; and EFTs should be used wherever available. This not only reduces the likelihood that an employee could manipulate circumstances for personal advantage, but also enables employees to catch one another’s inadvertent errors when no malice is intended.
  • Run a daily schedule and check it against charges, insurance claims, and payments. Stay current on insurance filings and ensure that all covered services are reported accurately. “Creative” insurance filings are a common form of embezzlement and could expose you to civil liability.

Pay attention to accounts receivables. Thoroughly explain coverage and fees to patients before treatment so they understand their financial obligations. Provide a printed statement at the end of each visit with the amount and type of payment made or owed. Send out monthly statements on unpaid balances and review all aged accounts with staff. Provide oversight and approval of unusual discounts, debt write-offs, and adjustments, and include an explanation for each transaction in the patient management system.

Protect Your Practice!
  • Strong Control Systems
  • Personal Oversight
  • Early Detection Protocols

Outsourcing your billing and collections function to a highly reputable third-party service can provide these layers of protection for you and your practice. Moreover, if theft is already taking place, an outside billing consultant may uncover it, provided they are savvy enough to realize “something isn’t quite right,” and then are tenacious enough to put the often complex, well-hidden puzzle pieces together.

For an added layer of protection and early detection, consider a company that offers an accounting service in addition to billing services. For example, eAssist’s dental bookkeeping and accounting services include balancing your practice management software and merchant statements with your day sheets, EFT insurance deposits, bank deposits and QuickBooks. Deposits and payments are accurately reconciled with your bank, and even your bills are paid if you want them to be.

When it comes to embezzlement, being in the majority is not a good thing! Even if not completely preventable, outsourcing your billing and collections to the right company can bring you peace of mind that someone’s got your back while you’re taking care of the patients in front of you.

Get started with eAssist today

Dental Billing